individuals accused of falsifying accounts and financial statements and  deceiving the public* in the STARK case. In this regard, the public prosecutor reported the accused persons to the Court and

Criminal Court sentenced the accused to pay a total fine of Baht 337,000 and a further fine of Baht 200 each day starting from the next day of prosecution date until the company so complies. Since the

judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange

Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case and sentenced the accused to12 year imprisonment for breaching of Section 56 and Section 312 of Securities and Exchange Act of 1992

of Benson Dupont Capital Management.? On the grounds that the accused person?s deposition was beneficial to the case, the Court sentenced Ravi to a two-year imprisonment.? The Court, however, dismissed

accused persons are offenders shall be subject to the investigation of the inquiry official, the prosecution of the public prosecutor, and the adjudication and discretion of the court of justice

in the first paragraph of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The Supreme Court sentenced the accused to 1-year imprisonment and pay a total fine of Baht 1,000,000 for violating Sections 281/2 paragraph 2 of the

Appeal Court, who had convicted all of the accused for such misconducts. ?The Appeal Court?s decision in this case will send a strong signal to executives of publicly traded company to become more cautious

take further action in accordance with the law.   The criminal complaint inures that the accused is considered to be untrustworthy characteristics of the securities issuing companies and listed

DSI for its consideration to take further legal action. The allegation shows that the accused are considered to be untrustworthy to perform duties as directors and executives of a securities issuing