client of trading orders via telephone at the end of the trading day.Making securities trading decisions on behalf of client is in violation of Clause 20(2) of the Notification of Capital Market
confirmed the clients' trading orders via telephone, as she understood that these could have been evidence of the clients' trading orders. However, {A} failed to record her accepting of security trading
;the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited ("GISP
Limited ("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited
Company Limited ("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company
("the subsidiary"), acted dishonestly through the subsidiary by entering into an advertising media installation contract on telephone booth with G.I.S. Park (Thailand) Company Limited ("GISP
failed to show evidence of their clients trading orders, and most of them admitted that they had taken orders via mobile phone, claiming the clients unfamiliarity with order execution via phone recording
contact him via mobile phone instead. Due to such behaviors, the employer suspended Nattavut for one month, starting from July 2 to 31, 2007. The SEC imposed the same sanction, taking effect simultaneously