specified by the client. He then made payment to such client for his own securities trading.The aforesaid acts of {A} and {B} were deemed dishonest and unprofessional in violation of Clauses 20(1) and 20(2
Limited (IFEC), with the Economic Crime Suppression Division of the Royal Thai Police (ECD) for committing dishonest acts to gain unfair advantage for himself or other persons. During the month of December
jointly with Thanjira repaid debt to Tisco Asset Management Co.,Ltd. From the said facts, Surasak was considered as jointly with Thanjira engaging in dishonest conducts. The aforesaid actions were in
. She deceived the client to transfer cash into his account and used the cash for her own securities trading. {A}'s actions were deemed dishonest, fraud, wrongful use of the clients? assets and
Unyakowit), who was then an IEC executive. Any person named in a criminal complaint filed by the SEC Office and under legal proceedings due to dishonest management of assets is deemed lacking trustworthy
and a dishonest misuse of his professional position. All investor contacts are duty bound to provide services with utmost care and prudence for the investors? best interest and shall strictly comply
(6) Mr. Tanyapisist Saprod and (7) Miss Metta Poking jointly failed to perform their duties with responsibility, due care, and loyalty or failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent and
value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to obtain any
approximate total value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to