thier own benefits, which fraudulently caused damage to PICNI's property, violating Section 307, 308, 311. The Appeal Court sustained the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006

Mr. Porames Laongsuwan Mr. Porames Laongsuwan aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal

Mr. Pinij Putrasart Mr. Pinij Putrasart aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court

Mr. Piriya Thawon Mr. Piriya Thawon aided and abetted Mr.Theeratchanon Lapvisutisin and Ms.Supaporn Lapvisutisin to commit the offences, thereby violating Section 315 of the SEA. The Appeal Court

Appeal Court overturned the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006 that dismissed the case. The Court sentenced the accused to five year imprisonment for entering into gas tank

cause the price or the volume of such securities trading to be inconsistent with the normal market condition and caused damages to other investors. 15/12/2020 The Civil Court delivered the Appeal Court

penalty to be imposed on the offender.    Appeal Any person who is affected by, and disagrees with, an administrative order has the right to appeal such order. The appeal procedure is provided by the SEC

, increased from Baht 341.3 million in the same period of the year 2016 or increased by 23.1 percent due to the same store sales of the company increased by 21.2 percent. The Company’s net profit was increased

’ list and then may exercise the right to appeal such DBD’s decision.According to Section 42 of the Administrative Procedure Act B.E. 2539 (1996), an administrative order shall be effective since the

) |- Auditors | - |- Approval (Section 30) |- Accounting and Financial Statements (Section 27, 28) |- Reporting Requirements |- Anti-money Laundering |- Arbitration |- Appeal |- Others | - |- Public Holidays