2020. Moreover, the Appeal Court ordered the defendant to reimburse Appeal Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.16/10/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had

cooperation if DSI requires additional clarifications or further investigation in the case.According to recent news reports, the public prosecutor has brought charges in the Criminal Court against seven

statement for the year 2015 (Form 56-1) and the annual report for the year 2015 (Form 56-2) to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt

statements for Q2/2016 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute of

statements for Q2/2015 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives failed and the statute

entires of revenues from sales in SINGHA 's 2007 financial statements in violation of Section 312 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA). The public prosecutor issued a prosecution

audited financial statements for the year 2013 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representative

reviewed financial statements for Q3/2014 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic person representatives

reviewed financial statements for Q2/2014 and the reviewed financial statements for Q3/2014 to the SEC and the SET within specified period. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt

asset depository service providers. This case is under consideration of the public prosecutor. DAB Act S.30 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 07/07/2022