. Her action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation of Section 89/7 of the SEA. This case is under

authorized director, causing the company to suffer losses. His action was deemed failure to perform duty with responsibility, due care, and loyalty for the best interest of the company, which was a violation

"), is responsible for the operation of Upbit. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Upbit concerning the case that between August 1, 2021 to

procedures for trading digital assets (trading rules) approved by the SEC. Also, the suspension did not comply with the standards as a professional required to perform and was the failure to deliver services

operation of Satang. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Satang concerning the case that between June 21, 2022 to December 31, 2022 Satang failed to

Bitazza. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Bitazza concerning the case that between November 25, 2022 to November 27, 2022 and December 23, 2022

responsible for the operation of Orbix. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Orbix concerning the case that between January 30, 2023 to May 30, 2023

Bitazza. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Bitazza concerning the case that between August 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 Bitazza failed to keep

of Satang. His failure to perform the required duty of his position resulted in the offence committed by Satang concerning the case that between August 1, 2021 to March 31, 2022 Satang failed to keep

, (1) Major General Boonlert Jangnopparat, (2) Mr. Chatnarong Chatrabhuti, and (3) Mr. Peerathuch Sukapong failed to perform their duties with dishonest intent, jointly dishonestly converted IFEC’s