16.36 percent of the total ordinary shares of Akkrawat, the Company has extended the completion of stage 3 investment by changing from within July 31, 2017 to complete within November 30, 2017. From the
placed greater emphasis on adjusting their deposit portfolio structure to increase the proportion of CASA while managing liquidity appropriate to the changing environment and in compliance with BOT
analysis by the REIT Manager concerning the effect of changing a lessee; 4.3 in the case that the main lessee is a group of related persons of the REIT 6 Manager, specify such relationship and related
operation monitoring. 5.1.2 The board should nurture innovation that enhances long-term value creation for the business in a changing environment. Such innovation may include designing innovative business
/or water-related litigation claims. - Market: All shifts in supply and demand for certain commodities, products, and services. - Reputation: All risks tied to changing customer or community perceptions
............................................................................................................................................................................. 59 [ 1 ] We do have to acknowledge that, for many companies, this is a challenge. The business environment is changing at an ever-faster pace. The “topple” rate, a measure of how rapidly market-leading
conditions after the transaction 1. The Company and VAVA are no policy to changing the core business of the Company. The Company will continue to operate as usual. 2. VAVA agrees not to sell the newly issued
conditions after the transaction 1. The Company and VAVA are no policy to changing the core business of the Company. The Company will continue to operate as usual. 2. VAVA agrees not to sell the newly issued
intermediary shall conspicuously announce the names of the persons under Clause 8(1), (2), (3) and (4) at its every office, and also disclose those names on its website. In case of changing the names of persons
the dependent variable is the corporate culture index, is also similar. One criticism that may be raised at this method is that board gender diversity is sticky, changing relatively slowly over time. As