Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should
offences regarding market misconduct, and introducing civil penalty as an alternative sanction. Assistant Secretary-General Sakkarin Ruamrangsri said: ?The nature of market misconduct has become more
well as other social media, to invest in securities or futures. The solicitation was made with a promise to manage investment to achieve high rate of returns within a short period of time, providing that
well as other social media, to invest in securities or futures. The solicitation was made with a promise to manage investment to achieve high rate of returns within a short period of time, providing that
securities for the client's account. Besides, communication records between {A} and his client showed his promise to payback. Making trading decisions on securities in the client's account without the client's
information and listed company executives? duty performance without due care, resulting in the total 31-million-baht civil penalty and the total 19.6-million-baht compensation for the equal amount of benefits
Earlier, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions against Mr. A for obstructing and failing to set up a board of directors meeting and a shareholders meeting to
Protection for Subscribers upon the Expiration of Concession Agreements or the Agreement to Operate B.E. 2013. and (2) the Arbitral Tribunal ordering TRUE to pay TOT Public Company Limited (“TOT”) penalty for
support cash conversion. In addition, it was found that there are solicitors who promise or guarantee high returns from such ICOs investment in the form of Ponzi scheme, luring investors into quick, ill
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr