lawsuit against Surin in the Civil, pressing for civil sanctions with the highest legal penalty. SEC has sought the Court’s ruling to require Surin to pay a civil fine, compensate the benefits received
paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the
inflicted the punishment of 16-month imprisonment and 5,333,333.33 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments, resulting in 8-month imprisonment and 2,666,666.67 Baht
as a listed-company director with responsibility, prudence, honesty and integrity. As a result, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee ordered Mr. A to pay a civil fine and compensate the SEC for
40,000. As the accused confessed, the penalty was reduced by half to a 6 months imprisonment and a fine of Baht 20,000. Since the accused had never been sentenced to imprisonment, the jail term was
penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the audited financial statements for the year 2012, the Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 20,000 Baht and a
punishment of 2-year imprisonment and 8,000,000 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments by half, resulting in 1-year imprisonment and 4,000,000 baht. The jail term was
4,000,000 Baht fine. The jail term was suspended for two years. The later, on August 22, 2019, The Appeal Court only reversed the judgment of the Criminal Court, not pending for punishment. - This case
. The Court inflicted the punishment of 16-month imprisonment and 5,333,333.33 Baht fine. Since the defendant pleaded guilty, the Court reduced the punishments, resulting in 8-month imprisonment and
manipulation of Millcon Steel Public Company Limited ("MILL")'s share price by conducting financial transactions related to MILL share trading and being a beneficiary, instead of Mr. Sittichai and