- 0.0% - 0.0% 3.00 0.4% 100.0% 100.0% Advertising income 1.95 0.3% 2.35 0.3% 7.52 0.9% 220.0% 285.6% Total revenue from core business (4 items) 769.13 100.0% 842.14 100.0% 848.81 100.0% 0.8% 10.4% Cost of
- 0.0% - 0.0% 3.00 0.4% 100.0% 100.0% Advertising income 1.95 0.3% 2.35 0.3% 7.52 0.9% 220.0% 285.6% Total revenue from core business (4 items) 769.13 100.0% 842.14 100.0% 848.81 100.0% 0.8% 10.4% Cost of
expenses associated with GLAND’s operations since the acquisition in 3Q18 onwards. Nonetheless, CPN demonstrated prudent cost control measures and closely monitors the expenditure level to match revenue
between the US and China, baht appreciation and pending of government expenditure as delay of government established. Having considered the above-mentioned circumstances, the Bank of Thailand lowered the
in year 2017 the company had received an interest from short term investment Baht 1.0 million. 2. Cost of sale , Profit margin In year 2017 the company had cost of sale Baht 333.48 million compare with
$99.4 +6.2% $113.0 -10.2% ] Cost of Sales 2,450.3 2,424.7 2,457.1 2,692.4 Gross margin, % 20.66% 18.98% 21.09% 27.04% SG & A 421.8 415.5 403.1 463.7 Operating Profit 217.0* 213.3** 248.2* + 1.7% 517.3
containment measures in Thailand. With regards to domestic demand, public expenditure would remain an important economic driver. Meanwhile, private consumption should gradually pick up compared to second
synergies of the acquisition contributed to the growth in revenue while variable cost synergies (particularly on fuel specific consumption optimization) contributed positively to consolidated EBITDA
represented 10.6% YOY while non-durable goods, in which high proportion of low to medium-income household expenditure, growth only 0.0% YOY since partly owing to household debt that was still elevated at 78% to
from core business (4 items) 714.91 100.0% 832.82 100.0% 842.14 100.0% 1.1% 17.8% Cost of services (535.72) -74.9% (658.51) -79.1% (658.33) -78.2% 0.0% 22.9% Gross profit 179.19 25.1% 174.31 20.9% 183.81