mislead such client into believing that he had transferred the securities back when in fact he had already sold almost all of those securities.Pongsa?s actions were deemed defrauding, misappropriating or

in buying capital increase shares of those subsidiaries. Although such actions had been approved by either the BSI?s board of director meeting or the shareholders? meeting, there is no evidence showing

Investigation (DSI), Ministry of Justice, for further actions. CIRKIT submitted its financial statements for the years 2003-2005 recording loss of approximately 3.44 billion baht from allowance for doubtful

opening or closing prices of the securities –resulting in unusual increases in the prices and trading volumes of all four securities beyond normal market conditions, etc.Patcharadanai’s actions above were

/2001 2. Notification of the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission  SorNor. 12/2545 Determination of Rules and Procedures for Actions by Management Companies against Incorrect Value of

his employer. The SEC then probed into the case and found from conversation records that Nongun had obtained authorization to trade derivatives for the client. He then proceeded to take the actions with

records that {B} had obtained authorization to trade derivatives for the client. He then proceeded to take the actions with such permission.In performing their duty, an investment consultant can send

prices, while Prayuth and Naruephol used their own accounts to manipulate the SECC share. Porntep?s and Arada?s actions were liable to contravention of Section 243(1) in conjunction with Section 244 and

worked for Country Group), had used incomplete Customer Confirmation and Portfolio reports in substitution for order tickets. Their actions were deemed as failure to record the customers? securities

? accounts that he borrowed the money from, for other?s or his own benefits. The SEC reviewed and found that Chalerm?s actions were deemed fraudulent, deceitful, interference with clients? assets with the