paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

, Chupong was deemed to have performed duties dishonestly. In this regard, Chupong, were deemed to have committed offences in violation Section 311 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1992 (SEA), and

to order or act where he has the duty, resulted in the offence committed by Zipmex concerning the case that during May 8, 2022, to July 20, 2022, Zipmex induced its own customers to deploy ZipUp

disclosed to the public. Mrs. Usuma and Miss Thitirat rendered assistance to his commission of the offense. 31/10/2023 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense

defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to jointly reimburse court fees to

a judgement that the defendant had committed an offense under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty in amount of 333,333.33 Baht. Moreover, the court ordered the defendants to

inconsistent with the facts to deceive other persons. He committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million

other persons. Mr. Bhusana committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million baht. Mr. Sutin and

the facts to deceive other persons. Mr. Bhusana Committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million

other persons. Mr. Bhusana Committed a fraud by misappropriating IEC assets through a purchase transaction of 75% of IEC Sakaeo 1 Co., Ltd. (SK1) shares at the amount of 345 million baht. Mr. Sutin