six persons caused damage to TOPLINE in approximate total value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to
approximate total value of 88 million baht. In this regard, Miss Orranan and Mr. Nugul failed to perform the duties with dishonest intent causing damage to TOPLINE or causing themselves or another person to
offence related to property committed with dishonest intent; (3) having been a director, a manager or a person with power of management of a financial institution which had its license revoked, unless an
committed an offense under Section 89/25*, for example, taking the assets of the juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening
higher risk level in buying financial products with a higher risk than the client’s risk profile. SEC has considered the case and viewed that Somchai had behaviors with dishonest implication, affecting the
juristic person with dishonest intent, obtaining unlawful gains which damages the juristic person, or altering, shortening or falsifying documents. In addition, SEC has prescribed a procedure for
committed upon the dishonest misappropriation of the fund for personal gains. The actions committed by Mr. Chiyachantana and Ms. Hongsri were liable to be the offenses under Section 308, Section 311
and executives of KC and others for jointly committing with dishonest intent by authorizing KC to http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce
executives of KC and others for jointly committing with dishonest intent by authorizing KC to http://market.sec.or.th/public/idisc/en/Enforce