Earlier, the Civil Sanction Committee had resolved to impose a civil sanction on the three offenders who were subject to pay a separate civil penalty and compensate for the benefits that should
executives of the company under Chapter 3/1 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. The proposed rules aim to achieve a better balance between compliance cost for listed firms and benefit of public
offences regarding market misconduct, and introducing civil penalty as an alternative sanction. Assistant Secretary-General Sakkarin Ruamrangsri said: ?The nature of market misconduct has become more
public policy and pre-determined criteria. This exemption rule would facilitate social enterprises in raising fund for their operation to achieve the objectives of promoting employment or solving social
information and listed company executives? duty performance without due care, resulting in the total 31-million-baht civil penalty and the total 19.6-million-baht compensation for the equal amount of benefits
Earlier, the Civil Penalty Consideration Committee resolved to apply civil sanctions against Mr. A for obstructing and failing to set up a board of directors meeting and a shareholders meeting to
Protection for Subscribers upon the Expiration of Concession Agreements or the Agreement to Operate B.E. 2013. and (2) the Arbitral Tribunal ordering TRUE to pay TOT Public Company Limited (“TOT”) penalty for
the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), as the case may be. The said actions also caused damage to the company but brought about benefits to Mr
- public information by virtue of his positions before such information became public on August 8, 2014. 24/05/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as
/2017 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows : - a compensation of the benefit received from committing the offense in