rendered a judgement in the Red Case No. Por. 5396/2562, wherein the defendant was required to pay (1) a civil penalty, 1.25 times the benefits that the defendant received or would have received from
information to sell IFEC shares, to pay civil penalty and compensation for the benefits gained from committing the offense. However, Suphanan did not agree to comply with the civil sanction. Later, on 27
any non-deductible expense, penalty and surcharge, as recorded in 2018 in the amount of about Baht 4.15 million incurred in relation to import duty assessment. บริษัท อินเตอร์ ฟาร์มา จาํกัด เลขที่ 140/9
advisors totaling Baht 1 .3 1 million. In 2019, however, the Company did not incur any non-deductible expense, penalty and surcharge, as recorded in 2018 in the amount of about Baht 4.15 million incurred in
which contained expense of repair of DEMCO’s construction projects. Mr.Suwat used such non-public information material to gain unfair benefits over other persons by virtue of his position as a Assistant
decreased revenue and increased expense from reservation of allowance for impairment losses of unused machine and doubtful accounts, (2) decreasing ratio of dividend payment for the year of 2016. Mr
expense from reservation of allowance for impairment losses of unused machine and doubtful accounts, (2) decreasing ratio of dividend payment for the year of 2016. Mr. Chana had accessed the information
10% Cost 1,631 1,509 Gross profit 209 164 45 28% Gross profit margin 11.3% 9.8% Other income 6 2 4 246% Selling & Admin expenses 123 121 2 2% 6.7% 7.2% Cost and expense from delayed project 57 (57
Mr.Boonchoke Thiratarakorn . 31/10/2024 agreed to comply with civil penalties determined by the Civil Penalty Committee as follows : - a civil monetary penalty of