subsidiary and listed company, which was deemed dishonest act causing damage to GGC. They committed the offense with nine associates who were raw material distributors, namely (3) Anatta Green Co., Ltd
dine-in areas resulting in higher proportion of take-home products and orders via food delivery services, which have lower margins than dine-in products, as well as the sales of raw material to Mikka
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
. Zait Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
. Zait Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its
Pattanamas, proceeded GGC to purchase raw materials and pay the distributors for the purchase in full without receiving all of the raw materials or receiving only part of it. However, GGC recorded in its