offense under Section 242(1) in conjunction with Section 243(1), subject to the penalties under Section 296 and Section 296/2 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA).By allowing Dr

punishment of those found to be in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act, the SEC said it has made good progress in examining many complaints. Investigations are on-going and more time is needed to

Asset Management Co., Ltd.), has committed an offense with dishonest intent and obtained unlawful gains for himself or another person by authorizing a mutual fund of Solaris Asset Management Co., Ltd. to

the SEC’s examination, is considered an offense of making false entries or omitting material statements in the accounts or documents of, or related to, a juristic person. This constitutes a violation

that  he continued to submit trading orders in the same manner. The act of Surin constituted a violation of Section 244/3 and will be subject to punishment under Section 296, Section 296/1, and

is considered a violation of Section 26, resulting in an offense liable to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The actions of Arrom and Natach are deemed

operated without any license and is considered a violation of Section 26, resulting in an offense liable to the penalties under Section 66 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses. The actions of

operating the digital asset dealer business under Section 3 of the Emergency Decree on Digital Asset Businesses without license in violation of Section 26 and subject to the penalties under Section 66 of the