Capital Market Supervisory Board’s regulations.* Therefore, the SEC has revoked Sareerat’s approval as Investment Consultant for Complex Products Type 2** for 10 years. However, since her approval has
characteristic of capital market business personnel. SEC has therefore revoked his approval as investment consultant for plain instruments** and prohibited him from performing duties as capital market business
loss. Moreover, {A} advised the client to wait for a quota of IPO shares and expect such shares to compensate for the loss incurred in the client’s derivatives trading account. {A}’s behaviors above were
investment consultant for 6 months. Owing to the fact that {A}'s approved securities investment consultant status only lasts until December 31, 2014 which is less than 6 months, the suspension was then imposed
Bangkok, 15 February 2017 ? The SEC has revoked the approval of a securities investment consultant, Mr. Niran Rodchaiya, and banned him from functioning as capital market personnel for 10 years on
Bangkok, June 15, 2015 ' The SEC suspended {A}, a capital investment consultant for trading securities and derivatives on behalf of client. He worked with Globlex Securities Company Limited while the
Bangkok, October 2, 2014 - The SEC suspended {A}, a capital market investment consultant of Globlex Securities Company Limited, for trading on a securities trading account of the client without
In addition, SEC shall not accept her future application for approval as capital market business personnel until the revocation period ends. At the time of her misconduct, Sunisa was working for TMB Bank Public Company Limited (TMB).According to the operating report of TMB, a Limited Broker Dealer and Underwriter (LBDU) licensee, and SEC’s further investigation, it was found that Sunisa had misappropriated the client’s money by forging the client’s signature, revising the client’s signific...
According to Bangkok Bank’s complaint report and SEC’s further investigation, it was found that during 22 September 2017 – 24 February 2018, {A}, then a securities investment consultant at the
transactions even though the client did not come to the trading room to order the transactions herself to earn compensation at a higher amount than she should have actually received. {A}’s acts were deemed as