PRO to rectify its financial statement for 2011 due to the limitation on auditing by the company?s executives on the matters concerning the company and its subsidiaries? failures to appraise the fair
due to the limitation on auditing by the company?s executives on the matters concerning the company and its subsidiaries? failures to appraise the fair value of land, constructions and equipments. In
investors to carefully and prudently study the information from the complete version of summarized significant features of securities (Fact Sheet) to clearly understand the product and appraise own risk
cash flows of the Company by selling to Ocean Fitting Co., Ltd., a connected person of the Company. Ocean Fitting Co., Ltd. won the bidding at the price of THB 78,000,000 (Seventy-eight million baht
the company and its subsidiaries? failures to appraise the fair value of fixed assets in order to determine their realization value as well as the auditor?s dissatisfaction by means of other audit
extended deadline because the new financial advisor whom PACE has appointed to appraise the fair value measurement of the investment is still gathering and analyzing data and information from many sources to
the extended deadline because the new financial advisor whom PACE has appointed to appraise the fair value measurement of the investment is still gathering and analyzing data and information from many
he obliged under any binding document to sell such assets to repay his debts. Moreover, it appears that NIPPON did not check the existence of such assets or appraise the value in consideration of the
, causing IFA unable to appraise the project value; (4) various risks associated with the acquisition of APU shares such as risk of fines payment to Myanmar government due to delay started of the project from