? wrongdoings are in contravention of Sections 311 and 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992).  The SEC investigation stemmed from a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand identifying

, regardless of the fact that he sold the entire purchased amount already.Following the SEC?s instruction for Bee to provide clarification with prompt rectification on the tender offer price for EIC?s shares as

activities with another foreign digital asset trading platform and allowing payment for the transactions made in Thai baht through Prompt Pay and Thai QR. Such provision of services may be deemed the

provide clarification on this matter with prompt rectification.  For the benefits of EIC shareholders, he is also notified to disclose such rectification to EIC for further dissemination through the SET

Securities (Thailand) Plc., and revealed non-compliant performance of {C}, for not taping clients' trading orders.  Following referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand indicating that {A} and {B} failed to

by virtue of their positions to purchase shares of Professional Waste Technology (1999) Public Company Limited (PRO).  The SEC investigation, following a referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand

the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC's probe found that during November 9-22, 2012, {A} purchased 1,786,100 {X1} Company shares based on the company positive non-public information

referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC's probe found that during July 27 - August 15, 2011, {A} sold 29 million {X1} Company shares in securities trading account of the {X2} Company. She

Thai Unique Coil Center Plc. (TUCC) shares and Vorapin Ngamkaiwan for using inside information to sell TUCC shares.With the referral from the Stock Exchange of Thailand, the SEC?s probe found that during

Bangkok, June 21, 2013 - The SEC revealed that the Settlement Committee imposed a fine of 500,000 baht on {A} for using inside information to sell shares of {X1}  Plc. With the referral from the