inaccurate accounts to deceive the others. Owing to the fact that Mr.Ratchasak made confession beneficial to the case, the Court reduced the punishments according to Section 78 of the Penal Code. Accordingly
the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement, to trade shares of Union Petrochemical Public Company Limited (UKEM
An unknown person From July 21 and August 20, 2007, Another unknown person person who was the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts colluded or agreed with Mr
unknown person who was the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts and five other persons who agreed to enter the settlement, to trade shares of Union Petrochemical Public
person who was the beneficial owner of Miss Karuna Kaewmanee’s securities trading accounts and five other persons who who agreed to enter the settlement, to trade shares of Union Petrochemical Public
deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
was beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code
beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code, resulting in a
Inquiry Official Dated 30/04/2001