Bangkok, June 20, 2012 ? The SEC Capital Market Supervisory Board resolved to amend regulations on the public offering of newly issued shares by public limited company that its major business is holding other company?s stocks ("holding company"). The amended regulations specify that holding company must hold shares in its subsidiaries that are categorized as its core business (either established in Thailand or in foreign countries) at the proportion not less than 50% of the total number of votin...

, such as, the forms of services, the presumption of algorithm, any relevant risks, including the factors or events that would hinder the use of technology, and such information must be sufficient enough

” พร้อมเดินหน้าผลักดัน 4 มาตรการหลัก ได้แก่ Quality Demand – Attractive Supply – Trusted Market – Supportive Ecosystem เพื่อเสริมสร้างความเชื่อมั่นให้ผู้ลงทุน ยกระดับขีดความสามารถในการแข่งขัน และเพิ่มเสน่ห์

securities, and enhance investors’ confidence.  According to the proposed regulations, the terms, “executive” and “business in the group” would be defined in accordance with the legal presumption under the

Capital Market Organizations (FETCO) to discuss and exchange policy views and approaches for reforming the Thai stock market to make it more attractive to investors and enhance its competitiveness on a

, claiming returns from cryptocurrencies, digital tokens or package investment plans in the form of Ponzi scheme. Solicitors may also promise or guarantee attractive returns, luring investors into quick

certificates will be limited to institutional investors or high net worth investors only; therefore, is exempted from the SEC?s approval.? ?To make investment in PE trust more attractive, the SEC will further

and financial literacy. The SEC Open House was not only attractive and stylish but comfortable enough for all visitors to make themselves at home. We obtained a very warm welcome from investors and the

ease the government?s burdens on budget and public debts. The Cabinet resolution today will support investment in infrastructure fund to become more attractive and the fund will support economic

. Such activities were in violation of Section 244/3 (1) and (2), the presumption under Section 244/5 and Section 244/6 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535 (1992) (SEA), in conjunction with