Bangkok, 1 August 2017 ? The SEC requires that Polaris Capital Public Company Limited (POLAR) immediately submit the special audit report which has passed due on 24 July 2017. Previously, the SEC instructed POLAR to conduct a special audit on the sources, existence and completeness of the accounting records and the disclosure in the financial statements of the liabilities whose material information differed from what had appeared in the application for business rehabilitation. POLAR missed the s...
liability arises from his failure to issue orders or perform the duties required to ensure compliance with the specified regulations, resulting in IHL’s delayed submission of the report. SEC Act S.300 in
Mr. Sumek Bamrungsuk Mr. Sumek Bamrungsuk, authorized Director, responsible for the operation of L.V. TECHNOLOGY Public Company Limited (“LVT”), shall be liable for LVT delayed to prepare and
Mr. Michael Andersen Mr. Michael Andersen, authorized Director, responsible for the operation of L.V. TECHNOLOGY Public Company Limited (“LVT”), shall be liable for LVT delayed to prepare and
effective cybersecurity plans. SEC Secretary-General Rapee Sucharitakul said: ?Cyber threats are evolving very fast and becoming more complicated. Preventive measures alone may not be enough. It is therefore
Supervisory Board. This liability arises from her failure to issue orders or perform the duties required to ensure compliance with the specified regulations, resulting in JCT’s delayed submission of the report
The Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992). In case of GL’s delayed to prepare and submit the accurate financial statements and financial reports within the period of time specified by
section 300 and section 56(1) - (4) of The Securities and Exchange Act of Thailand B.E. 2535 (1992). In case of GL’s delayed to prepare and submit the accurate financial statements and financial reports
was notified by the competent officer to comply with such orders, Zipmex delivered only partial or incomplete information. In addition, Zipmex delayed the delivery of information requested by the
transactions in the wallet. In this regard, although he was notified by the competent officer to comply with such orders, he delivered only partial or incomplete information. In addition, he delayed the delivery