, defrauded and embezzled the company’s money by falsifying purchasing documents of non-existent cars to deceive the company into paying the money to himself and other persons for those cars, thereby causing
capital funds on those dates, resulting in non-compliance with the prescribed capital fund maintenance requirements. Nevertheless, FPAM was able to restore its capital fund position to comply with the
statement for the year 2020 and those financial report within the period specified by the Notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board. The inquiry official sent the case back to the Settlement
concerning the value of securities or the suitability of investing in those securities and managing funds of a person or group of persons to acquire benefit from securities in consideration of a fee or other
securities or the suitability of investing in those securities of a person or group of persons to acquire benefit from securities in consideration of a fee or other remuneration, which was committed through
baht, and subsequently resold those shares to CMO for 65 million baht, a price significantly higher than the actual market value, causing damage to the company. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr
baht, and subsequently resold those shares to CMO for 65 million baht, a price significantly higher than the actual market value, causing damage to the company. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr
baht, and subsequently resold those shares to CMO for 65 million baht, a price significantly higher than the actual market value, causing damage to the company. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr
baht, and subsequently resold those shares to CMO for 65 million baht, a price significantly higher than the actual market value, causing damage to the company. In addition, the aforementioned act of Mr
debtors as GL’s income on those financial statements and financial reports but the fact that the transactions are an execution of asset misappropriation by GL’S former Chief Executive Officer. Therefore