adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, and Section 66 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant’s act constituted
Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr Ms. Sa-ngiam Pimkotr failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Ms. Somboon Pangphet Ms. Somboon Pangphet failed to comply with the competent officer's order to testify. The Pathumwan District Court sentenced the accused to three-month imprisonment and a
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The Court sentenced the accused to 15-day imprisonment and a fine of Baht 2,000. The jail term, however
order or an action which results in the offence that the company operated digital asset exchange businesses without a license. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty under Section
, violating Section 301. On February 9, 2011, the court sentenced the accused to one-year imprisonment. The accused appealed against the judgment of the Court. SEC Act S.301 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
violation of Section 315 of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535. On October 7, 2020, the Criminal Court sentenced the defendant to 10 years in prison. The defendant exercised the right to appeal. The
audited financial statements for the year 2012, the Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 20,000 Baht and a further fine of 200 Baht each day during which the contravention continued (174 days
order or an action which results in the offence that the company offered digital tokens to the public without an approval from the SEC Office. The Court of Appeal adjudicated that the defendant was guilty