Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of investment products and financial services for alien expatriates and residents in Hong Kong, Moscow, Shanghai and Bangkok. The aforesaid person had
range of investment products and financial services for alien expatriates and residents in Hong Kong, Moscow, Shanghai and Bangkok. The aforesaid person had not been licensed to operate securities
make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
PFS to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range
to make investments. Furthermore, PFS advertised on www.fsplatinum.com that PFS was the administration office of Platinum Financial Services Limited Hong Kong, which specialized in a diverse range of
rules, conditions and procedures as specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failed to implement an adequate system to ensure the accurate and complete management and
that the group of offerors were made aware of their duties and responsibilities to deliver a complete Form 247-4 to the shareholders, which is in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
. Bhusana and Mr. Maruphong Siriwat had signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment when in fact the construction was incomplete. This case is in the process of inquiry by