in absolute receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup

Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin and Miss. Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors. Later Mr. Sutin repaid

receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan, who were his debtors. Later Miss

receivership by the Central Bankruptcy Court's order. Mr. Bhusana acknowledged the order but persisted IEC to buy SK1 shares from Mr. Sutin Jaitham and Miss Charuwan Bhusanabhibankup, who were his debtors

thier own benefits, which fraudulently caused damage to PICNI's property, violating Section 307, 308, 311. The Appeal Court sustained the judgment of the Court of First Instance on November 24, 2006

reduced the fines by half, resulting in a fine of Baht 209,250 and a further fine of Baht 1000 for everyday during which the contravention continued. SEC Act S.56 and 199 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

audited financial statements for the year 2012, the Court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of 20,000 Baht and a further fine of 200 Baht each day during which the contravention continued (174 days

in a fine of Baht 209,250 and a further fine of Baht 1000 for everyday during which the contravention continued. SEC Act S.300 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 04/06/2014

Delta Paint Public Company (DPAINT) by placing a securities trading order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of DPAINT stocks to be inconsistent with the normal

trading order or trading securities on a continued basis causing the price and the volume of DPAINT stocks to be inconsistent with the normal market condition. that was inconsistent with the normal market