2020. Moreover, the Appeal Court ordered the defendant to reimburse Appeal Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.16/10/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement that the defendant had
course of business and charging fees. Also, there was no evidence indicating that purchase or sale orders were routed through any digital asset exchange. Instead, such activities were conducted outside any
the order through XT.COM. XT.COM charges fees for these services. Moreover, XT.COM induced Thai people and investors to use its services by promoting via Facebook, Telegram, and YouTube, as well as
;, which involved purchasing digital assets in exchange for cash and crediting such cash to Freedom Card, with fees charged. Furthermore, they solicited the public to use their services through Bitazza’s
Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital asset
Exchanges Commission inquiring about the conditions, rules, and fees for applying a digital asset exchange license. The aforementioned actions by CoinEx and Mr. Puttipong are deemed to be conducting digital
September 2020) until the payment is made in full. Moreover, the Civil Court ordered all defendants to jointly reimburse Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.03/09/2020 filed a lawsuit to a
payment is made in full. Moreover, the Civil Court ordered all defendants to jointly reimburse Court fees and attorney fees to the plaintiff.03/09/2020 filed a lawsuit to a civil court20/02
+, which is the service of Zipmex Pte. Ltd, and gained benefits from digital asset exchange fees. Additionally, such operation of Zipmex had no measure to protect the conflict of interest and to control the