(Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 28 August 2020.. However, Mr. Lertchai failed to prepared and disclosed the
in securities holdings (Form 59) in accordance with the SEC’s regulations, as his spouse had conducted a transaction involving ARROW securities on 7 July 2020. However, Mr. Tanon failed to prepared
specified in the notification of the Securities and Exchange Commission. In this regard, ERX failed to check the allocated foreign exchange limit prior to executing transactions. Accordingly, ERX conducted
course of business and charging fees. Also, there was no evidence indicating that purchase or sale orders were routed through any digital asset exchange. Instead, such activities were conducted outside any
exchange. Instead, such service was conducted outside any digital asset exchange. The aforementioned action of Bitazza and FreedomVerse shall be deemed to be the operation of a digital asset dealer without a
executing transactions. Accordingly, ERX conducted foreign currency transactions exceeding the approved limit set by the SEC office. DAB Act S.94 in conjunction with 30 Settlement Committee Meeting No. 4
, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved by the SEC
utility token, the aforementioned entities offered the newly issued digital token to the public without approval from the SEC Office. This was not conducted though a digital portal service provider approved