of the Plaintiff where the attorney’s fee and the legal cost are fixed at 150,000 Baht and 10,000 Baht, respectively. Currently, both cases have not been able to reach conclusion yet so the court is

of the Plaintiff where the attorney’s fee and the legal cost are fixed at 150,000 Baht and 10,000 Baht, respectively. In this case, the defendant has requested to extend the period of time for filing

request and the cost must be paid by the Defendant in lieu of the Plaintiff where the attorney’s fee and the legal cost are fixed at 150,000 Baht and 10,000 Baht Subsequently, on May 1, 2020, the defendant

responding and counterclaiming for damages in the amount by Baht 106. 3 million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the

lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not

Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company

. 3. The Group had the selling and administrative expenses, amount Baht 34.08 million, increase by Baht 13.29 million or 64.15 percent due to the main reason as follows: 3.1) Lawyer expenses, amount

of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the

expenses incurred from the subsidiary’s share acquisition ie. loan , advisory and lawyer fees for an aggregated amount of THB 2.3 million. Earnings before interest, taxes and depreciation (“EBITDA”) EBITDA

Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’ s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company