paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

advertisements also failed to include required warning statements or provide an audible presentation of such warnings. Furthermore, cryptocurrency advertisements were not restricted to Bitazza's official

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

investors to obtain further information about digital assets. The advertisements also failed to include required warning statements or provide an audible presentation of such warnings. Furthermore

different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated securities business without obtaining license from the

handle suitable portfolios for investors through different company names such as Global Investments Far East Limited and Global Investments International Limited. The aforesaid person jointly operated

experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3

experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In

as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been

for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities