of the BSEC shares. In this case, the offer price was higher than the market price.Sakorn had access to such insider information because at the time he was holding the positions of BSEC director, BFIT

the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535(1992) (SEA) in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code.  The DSI and public prosecutors probed into the case and decided to pursue charges against them

Bureau of Financial-Banking Crimes and Money Laundering, to discuss the developments of the legal proceedings in the case of Stark Corporation Public Company Limited (STARK), and to offer full

trading accounts to commit unfair trading activities was subject to the penalties under Paragraph 2 of Section 297 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code.In the case of Pilailpit, by

commit unfair trading activities was subject to the penalties under Paragraph 2 of Section 297 of the SEA in conjunction with Section 83 of the Penal Code. In the case of Pilailpit, by letting Atthavut and

After STARK had failed to prepare and submit its financial statements for the year 2022 within the specified period as required by law, the SEC, by virtue of Section 58 of the SEA, instructed the company to clarify its plan for the preparation and submission of such financial statements, including the repayment of all bonds issued by the company together with the possible impacts on investors, so that investors can have information for decision-making. At the same time, STARK was also instructed...

. In the case of Surasak, the evidence presented a ground to believe that he had known of the facts concerning such joint venture by virtue of his position as an audit committee member and independent

Offeror : SAHA-UNION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED | Date of submission of the Statement of Intention : 27/12/2021

Offeror : SAHA-UNION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED | Date of submission of the Statement of Intention : 08/02/2022

Offeror : SAHA-UNION PUBLIC COMPANY LIMITED | Date of submission of the Statement of Intention : 02/03/2022