), misappropriated PPPC's money to invest in and pay off debts of the companies over which he had full control for his own benefit, causing damage to PPPC's property, violating Section 307, 308 & 311

.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

case, none of the aforementioned entities had been licensed to operate securities business. Hence, their actions were in violation of Section 90 and liable to penalties under Section 289 of the

as manage portfolios suitable for different clients’s profiles via three websites: www.giltedgeintl.com www.on-t3-line.com and www.online-t3.com In case, none of the aforementioned entities had been

CPT Holding Co., Ltd. CPT Holding Co., Ltd. (“CPT Holding”) and two other legal entities ("group of offerors") failed to comply with the regulations as specified by the Capital Market

Saishin Energy LLC. Saishin Energy LLC. and two other legal entities ("group of offerors") failed to comply with the regulations as specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by

Real DC Co., Ltd. Real DC Co., Ltd. and two other legal entities ("group of offerors") failed to comply with the regulations as specified by the Capital Market Supervisory Board by

Lanna Resources Public Company Limited (“LANNA”) and Thai Agro Energy Public Company Limited (“TAE”) through other legal entities (chain principle), which resulted in crossing the 25 percent and 50

Company Limited (a 100-percent subsidiary of IEC) through a contract with Energy System Engineering and Service Co., Ltd. (ESES), deemed under control of Mr. Bhusansa and Mr. Saran, for the construction of

order and control STARK to issue rectified financial statement, but he neglected his duties and consented to the falsification of STARK and its subsidiaries’ financial statements. Moreover, Mr. Prakorn