EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity. Subsequently, on 2 June 2017, Mr. Phipat granted permission to a brokerage firm to sell EARTH

judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount

pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a sum of 333,333.33 Baht to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and

under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty and a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offense in a sum of 558,405 Baht together

declined EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity. Subsequently, during the period of 30 May 2017 to 7 June 2017, Mr. Khajohnpong and Mr

declined EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity. Subsequently, during the period of 30 May 2017 to 7 June 2017, Mr. Phisudhi and Mr

Exchange Act that knew or possessed the inside information of EARTH. That is, a financial institution declined EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period on 15 May 2017, which led to EARTH

possessed the inside information of EARTH, which is a financial institution declined EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period on 15 May 2017, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity

the inside information of EARTH, which is a financial institution declined EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period on 15 May 2017, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity

amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offence in a sum of 522,500 Baht together with 7.5% interest calculated from the amount equals to the benefit should have been received