judgment amending the Civil Court judgment. The Appeal Court imposed civil sanctions as follows: the payment of a sum of 24,538,815 Baht together with 7.5% per annum interest calculated from such amount
pay there own costs and expenses.25/02/2019 The Civil Court delivered a judgement ordering the defendant to pay a sum of 333,333.33 Baht to the plaintiff to be collected as public revenue and
under the lawsuit of the plaintiff, and imposed a civil penalty and a compensation at an equal amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offense in a sum of 558,405 Baht together
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of
. Sakesan Baisak (5) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon and (6) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the SEC exercised the power under Section 58(2) of The
amount to the benefit should have been received from committing the offence in a sum of 522,500 Baht together with 7.5% interest calculated from the amount equals to the benefit should have been received
(2) Mr. Patiphat Supasirisin (3) Mr. Sakesan Baisak (4) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC
Supasirisin (2) Mr. Vichet Thientong (3) Mr. Sakesan Baisak (4) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC
Thientong (3) Mr. Patiphat Supasirisin (4) Mr. Yosapong Pothasuthon (5) Mr. Suriyan Thongpikul and (6) Colonel Kanayos Suksanguan failed to provide explanation to questions stated in SEC letter, in which, the