the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission have suggested investment in the offered securities; nor contain any assurance in relation to the value or returns on the offered securities; nor

Securities and Exchange Commission have suggested investment in the offered securities; nor contain any assurance in relation to the value or returns on the offered securities; nor shall they certify the

registration statement neither represents that the Ministry of Finance of Thailand, the Securities and Exchange Commission or the Office of the Securities and Exchange Commission have suggested investment in the

. Related Party Transactions × XII. INTERESTS OF EXPERTS AND COUNSEL XIII. FINANCIAL INFORMATION A. Consolidated Statements and Other Financial Information × B. Significant Changes × XIV. ADDITIONAL

Capital Market Supervisory Board or the Office of Securities and Exchange Commission have suggested investment in the offered securities; nor contain any assurance in relation to the value or returns on the

registration statement neither represents that the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Capital Market Supervisory Board or the Office of Securities and Exchange Commission have suggested investment in the

แบบแสดงรายการขอมูลการเสนอขายตราสารหน้ี (รายครั้ง) (แบบ 69-DEBT-PO-GOV.AGENCY) บริษัท........... (ช่ือไทย/อังกฤษของผูเสนอขายตราสารหน้ี) ............. เสนอขาย ......................................................................................................................... ......................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................................

responding and counterclaiming for damages in the amount by Baht 106. 3 million, including the interest, on the ground of the breach of contract against the Company. The Company’ s lawyer suggested that the

lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company. Consequencely, the Company has not

Company. The Company’s lawyer suggested that the Company had not breached the above memorandum, and the Company’s management concurred that the case would be ruled in the favour of the Company