17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act violating
under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act
a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the
fine of Baht 7000. The jail term, however, was suspended. SEC Act S.303 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 30/07/2008
Mr. Chusak Ruentip Mr. Chusak Ruentip failed to comply with the competent officer's order. The Court sentenced the accused to 15-day imprisonment and a fine of Baht 2,000. The jail term, however
benefits and long-term return. Mr. Malpass received profits from providing investment advisory service in the ordinary course of business. Thus, Mr. Malpass operated securities business as investment advisor
benefits and long-term returns. Gilt Edge also advertised that the company had a team of professional and experienced experts to render financial knowledge and advice as well as manage portfolios suitable
foreign investors to make investments according to Gilt Edge’s advice and management to earn tax benefits and long-term returns. Gilt Edge also advertised that the company had a team of professional and