to order or act duty resulting in Beyond’s engagement in any other business which is not a licensed securities business without permission from the Capital Market Supervisory Boards approval which
but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed derivatives business. This case is under consideration of the public
Financial (NZ) Ltd. had been registered with the SEC as derivatives dealer but with permission to provide services only to institutional investors. Its public solicitation was therefore considered unlicensed
EARTH's requests for extension of the repayment period, which led to EARTH's lack of liquidity. Subsequently, on 2 June 2017, Mr. Phipat granted permission to a brokerage firm to sell EARTH
misconduct above is deemed an execution of concealed transactions, asset misappropriation, permission of false accounting transactions and preparation of incorrect accounting records. In addition, he informed
a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the
17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act violating
under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act