a single offense that violates multiple legal provisions. Pursuant to Section 90 of the Criminal Code, the penalty shall be imposed under the provision prescribing the heaviest punishment, namely, the
17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act violating
under Section 17 paragraph one, Section 26, Section 57, Section 66, and Section 94 of the Royal Decree on Digital Asset Businesses B.E. 2561 (2018). The defendant's conduct constituted a single act
rules, conditions and procedures as specified in the notification of the Capital Market Supervisory Board by failed to implement an adequate system to ensure the accurate and complete management and
that the group of offerors were made aware of their duties and responsibilities to deliver a complete Form 247-4 to the shareholders, which is in violation of the Securities and Exchange Act B.E. 2535
. Bhusana and Mr. Maruphong Siriwat had signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the full payment when in fact the construction was incomplete. This case is in the process of inquiry by
construction of a wastewater treatment system and a water purifier system of an IEC project in Rayong province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Maruphong had signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved
of a wastewater treatment system and a water purifier system of an IEC project in Rayong province. Mr. Bhusana and Mr. Maruphong had signed in acceptance of the complete construction and approved the