technology to private fund management in analysis, selection and screening of securities trading signals, did not comply with the rules, conditions and procedures announced by the Capital Market Supervisory
believing that JKN had an increase in trade creditors that year. These fictitious trade creditors were then used to exercise voting rights in the selection of JKN’s business rehabilitation planner. This case
believing that JKN had an increase in trade creditors that year. These fictitious trade creditors were then used to exercise voting rights in the selection of JKN’s business rehabilitation planner. This case
gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
caused damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s
damage to GSC or others obtained benefit. In this regard, they jointly decided, approved, or ordered GSC to grant 7 loans to Asia Capital Group Public Company Limited ("ACAP"), a GSC’s subsidiary