;EA"). His duty was to oversee and ensure that EA’s offering for sale of securities complied with the law. However, Mr. Amorn failed to issue instructions or perform the necessary duties required
Company Limited (“BAY”). Being the person responsible for BAY’s operations, she failed to issue orders or omitted to perform her duties as required. This pertains to the case where BAY, acting as the
Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with the others. The inquiry official informed the
registration with the SEC in violation of Section 16 of the Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the
. 2546 (2003). This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with
). This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with the others
Derivatives Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender
Act B.E. 2546 (2003). This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender
case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. According to the SEC News Release No. 103/2012, the SEC filed a criminal complaint against the alleged offender together with the others. The