-supervision system for executive asset management that was insufficient to prevent conflicts of interest. Specifically, Bualuang Securities issued internal approvals exempting six executives from the firm’s

or GLH benefited from these loans or any reasonable grounds to believe it was done for the benefit of GL and/or GLH businesses. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89/7 89/24 311 and

competent officer without a reasonable cause or excuse. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.75 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 07/09/2022

of information requested by the competent officer without a reasonable cause or excuse. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.75 Criminal Complaint Filed with an

;s system for categorizing customers and offering debentures according to the customer classification, as well as its supervision were insufficiently stringent because CL did not inspect that the

comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower

comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower

comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower

comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower

comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower