advertisements also failed to include required warning statements or provide an audible presentation of such warnings. Furthermore, cryptocurrency advertisements were not restricted to Bitazza's official
or GLH benefited from these loans or any reasonable grounds to believe it was done for the benefit of GL and/or GLH businesses. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 in conjunction with 89/7 89/24 311 and
competent officer without a reasonable cause or excuse. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.75 Criminal Complaint Filed with an Inquiry Official Dated 07/09/2022
of information requested by the competent officer without a reasonable cause or excuse. This case is in the process of inquiry by the inquiry official. DAB Act S.75 Criminal Complaint Filed with an
investors to obtain further information about digital assets. The advertisements also failed to include required warning statements or provide an audible presentation of such warnings. Furthermore
comply with GSC’s investment policy causing GSC to experience high investment risks and lose the opportunity to gain higher and reasonable interest rate. Moreover, ACAP obtains benefit from the lower