;s system for categorizing customers and offering debentures according to the customer classification, as well as its supervision were insufficiently stringent because CL did not inspect that the

gained the benefit were dishonest duty performance, as specified under Section 89/7 and Paragraph 2 of Section 281/2 of the SEA. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case

's system for categorizing customers and offering debentures according to the customer classification, as well as its supervision were insufficiently stringent because CL did not inspect that the

against Mr. Suphan Sethapanich for this offense at the same time. The public prosecutor decided not to pursue the case in court and the case was deemed final. SEC Act S.281/2 paragraph 2 311 283