procedures as specified in the notification. In this regard, Bitazza failed to provide the management and operational data recording system by failing to present appropriate loan process and agreements to the
its revenue from providing mobile phone service during the subscribers protection period starting from its entering into the interim subscribers protection measure pursuant to the NBTC’s Notification on
, Bitazza failed to provide the management and operational data recording system by failing to present appropriate loan process and agreements to the SEC office. DAB Act S.94 in conjunction with 30
show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the
statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to the penalty under Sections 312 and 315 of the Securities and
scrap. This resulted in AMAC’s 2008 and 2009 financial statements to show inaccurate financial condition and operational results in order to mislead the public; in contravention of and shall be liable to
opened without requiring additional identity verification. In addition, Bitazza provided essential operational systems to Bitazza Global. The aforementioned actions by Bitazza Global and Bitazza are deemed