procedures as specified in the notification. In this regard, Bitazza's compliance system for monitoring the operations of the digital asset business operator was deficient. In particular, Bitazza failed

procedures as specified in the notification. In this regard, Bitazza failed to provide appropriate internal systems and processes for preparing, approving, and supervising advertisements. In particular

for monitoring the operations of the digital asset business operator was deficient. In particular, Bitazza failed to prepare an audit plan that appropriately reflected the relevant risks. The audit

preparing, approving, and supervising advertisements. In particular, Bitazza's advertisement review process was inadequate. As a result, advertisements published during this period contained contents

paragraph 1 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the penalty prescribed for each offence as follows: (1) For a count of failure to submit the

Court ruled against the accused for violating Section 56, Section 274 paragraph 1, and Section 300 of the SEA. As the accused committed the several distinct and different offences, the Court inflicted the

drive up prices, and submitting buy orders during the pre-opening or closing periods to manipulate opening or closing prices. The specific instances of manipulation occurred during the following periods