owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the
outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial statements for the year 2015 without
the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual financial
believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the annual
auditor into believing that the debtor owing the outstanding balance of fuel charge worth 53.62 million baht was capable of debt repayment to the company before the auditor signed off the disclosure of the
Mr. Jakkaphong Jakrajutatip Jakkaphong, as a person responsible for the operations of the legal entity, caused JKN to commit the aforementioned offense. He is therefore subject to the same penalty
(“SOTUS”), a legal entity in which Mr. Somphote held more than 30 percent of the total voting rights and was its largest shareholder, purchased EA shares. Therefore, Mr. Somphote was required to prepare and