deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine

deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine

beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code, resulting in a

Electronics Industry Public Company Limited Electronics Industry Public Company Limited, a securities issuer, prepared and submitted the inaccurate financial statements for Q1/ 2016 ended March, 2016

was beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code

Construction PLC (FOCUS), Inter Far East Engineering PLC (IFEC), and The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI) - in concealment through trading accounts of eight persons and on a continual basis to mislead and lure

The Royal Ceramic Industry PLC (RCI) by arranging trading accounts of other persons for Mr. Sagha, sending manipulative trading orders, and helping with related financial transactions. The Appeal Court

Mr.Trairath Treeratpant Mr.Trairath Treeratpant agreed or conspired with twelve other persons to manipulate the price and trading volume of The Union Mosaic Industry Public Company Limited (UMI

Mr. Promakran Srinarong Mr. Promakran Srinarong agreed or conspired with twelve other persons to manipulate the price and trading volume of The Union Mosaic Industry Public Company Limited (UMI

Mr. Prabpol Singtong Mr. Prabpol Singtong agreed or conspired with twelve other persons to manipulate the price and trading volume of The Union Mosaic Industry Public Company Limited (UMI) shares by