deemed beneficial to the adjudication process, the Court considered it a mitigating factor. Accordingly, the sentence was reduced by half under Section 78 of the Criminal Code. The final sentence is a fine
beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code, resulting in a
was beneficial to the adjudication of the case, the Court considered it a mitigating circumstance. Accordingly, the punishment is reduced by half in accordance with Section 78 of the Criminal Code
also colluded to act dishonestly in selling NUSA condominium units in Bangkok at a price lower than the appraised price and transferring funds out of NUSA into personal accounts and those of close