solicited the public to make an investment with the company based on a scheme of the shares investment package started at 1,000 to 1,000,000 bath with a high return of 5 percent of dividend per week for 95

including appropriate and sufficient personnel to be able to operate the securities brokerage business efficiently. The public prosecutor issued a prosecution order; however, attempt to arrest the juristic

Broadgate Mutual Fund Brokerage Securities (Thailand) Company Limited Broadgate Mutual Fund Brokerage Securities (Thailand) Company Limited failed to provide the work system including appropriate and

digital assets to be offered for trading, including the delisting of digital assets. Moreover, Zipmex failed to perform its duties with due care as the professional should exercise in accordance with

company contacted and solicited the public as well as disseminated related investment documents and information through various channels including website www.ngm-trading.com to lure the investing public

as well as disseminated related investment documents and information through various channels including website www.famarkets.com to lure the investing public into their businesses. The aforesaid act

procedures as specified in the notification. In this regard, Bitazza insufficiently provided the system to ensure that Bitazza could know and verify the true identity of its customers, including acquiring

for the decision-making on investment or using the service such as the clients’ assets investment scheme, the risks of ZipUp+ program and the conflict of interest together with relationship among Zipmex

launder money causing damages to ADAM even though it was known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme

known at that time that Kitha was being investigated by the National Anti-Corruption Commission (“NACC”) on a case relating to rice-pledging scheme and Kitha was not qualified to be a listed company in